law in animal rights

1. What is your response to this law? Is the penalty sufficient, too strict, or too lenient? Do you think this law is enforced or is it just for show? (in other words, how often do police investigate animal cruelty crimes?). Do you have any specific suggestions for how the system could be improved? (200 word minimum)

I don’t know, it’s not too strict or too lenient. But it makes feel strange is that, what kind of animals are pets? It’s said that “The amendment clarifies the ban on killing "pets" for meat or fur by specifying dogs and cats as pets.” what if I have a chicken as a pet and when it grew up I want to make it as my meal? Have I obeyed the law? If I have what about the people who kill the chicken and sell it? It’s my pet, could it count as killing pets for meal? To me these laws are just trying to make the animal lover to feel better, yes, it’s seems to be a show to me. If you really love animals then why do you still eat them? It’s not only dogs and cats are animals, pigs, chicken, lamb, cows… they are animals too. I just think those people who said they are animal lovers are just too artificial. Fighting for animal rights? Bull shit! If you are a vegetarian, and you think eating animal are too cruel then I do believe that you really love animals. Some people say that, dogs is man’s best friend, I think if you have any animal with you and take good care of them from small to big, I’m sure every animal will be your best friend. I think to improve this law better improve the peoples mind first, instead of give a law that so complicated but to teach people to be responsible for their own pets, for example, if they want to have a pet then treat it as a part of their family members, don’t just leave it on the road or something. This law, I think it’s only been use for those sick people who kill animals for fun, or those who haven’t got any responsibility.